Solutions
One thing is beyond dispute: the business models of start-ups are not geared for higher prices, nor are private parties: if a shoemaker’s price suddenly doubles, the customer looks for a cheaper shoemaker, even if they are in the informal economy.
In France and Sweden, a step has already been taken toward dealing with the problem. There, customers do pay a higher hourly rate, but then get a substantial part back from the tax authorities. In this way, the shoemaker is protected and stays off the black market. Two drawbacks, though: the government generates no tax revenue and shoemakers who do not work via Helpling are placed at a competitive disadvantage.
Another approach to the problem would be the provision of affordable insurance. In Pennsylvania, for example, Uber drivers can insure themselves at a rate of five cents per trip.
Third status
Yet another possible solution could be to create a so-called third status for gig workers who are neither employees nor self-employed. They would be registered and pay tax, but their platform would pay them a higher hourly wage. The question is whether this is such a great idea, and if providing protection should not be the first priority.
What is clear is that a solution to the problem has yet to be found. It is certain to form part of the agenda of a future Dutch cabinet. As we see it, this discussion should be viewed as part of a wider one concerning the jobs market as a whole. If everybody – the clients, the platforms and the gig workers – each make their contribution, it must be possible to find a legal place for new forms of work, so that, in future, new types of professionals do not slip through the cracks.
